AN INDEPENDENT PLATFORM FOR CONTEMPORARY ART
ART VALUE LAB
Explore this series

Artists: training, ambition and authorship · 03 / 03

Becoming an Artist: Women, Training, Labor, and Authorship

Women Artists of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries | From the Convent Refectory to the London Portrait Studio

Judith Leyster, Self-Portrait, about 1630. National Gallery of Art, Washington, Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Robert Woods Bliss (1949.6.1). Courtesy National Gallery of Art, Washington, CC 0. (Proportionally resized and converted to WebP.) Image source · CC0 1.0

Look first, then read

Before judging the skill visible in a painting, what would we need to know about its maker’s access to teaching, models, materials, time, and professional recognition?

Pause and find the details that support your interpretation.

Begin reading
01Looking 1 | Who Looks at Whom?

Follow the gazes in Anguissola’s The Chess Game and Leyster’s Self-Portrait. Identify looks exchanged within the image and those directed beyond it. How does each painter make those relationships demonstrate her own abilities?

02Looking 2 | One Paint, Different Textures

Compare Fontana’s lace, Peeters’s cheese and metal lid, and Ruysch’s petals. Distinguish sharp boundaries from highlights and soft transitions. Which effects announce themselves at a distance, and which reward close inspection?

03Evidence Exercise | Connect the Name to the Work

For Nelli’s Last Supper and Beale’s studio, distinguish the principal author, possible collaborators, commissioning circumstances, and surviving evidence. How can an account recognize collective labor while retaining the principal artist’s responsibilities?

Judith Leyster turns from her easel toward us, brush suspended, while the violinist on her canvas seems to keep playing. This is an artist introducing her command of image-making. Its apparent ease invites a harder set of questions: how did she acquire that command, recruit pupils, and reach customers? And after a work left her studio, what would keep her name attached to it?

Dr Antonia Gatward Cevizli’s lecture approaches women artists through different cities, generations, and social circumstances. A convent, an aristocratic household, a father’s workshop, a guild, or a marriage could each offer resources while imposing limits. The nine careers explored here resist a single story of exceptional genius overcoming adversity. Their paintings also belong to histories of sustained labor: abilities learned, publicly demonstrated, sold, and sometimes subsequently attributed to someone else.

A timeline of events

  1. Mid-sixteenth century

    Different Routes through Convents and Households

    Nelli makes religious paintings in her Florentine convent; Anguissola paints The Chess Game in 1555 and goes to the Spanish court in 1559.

  2. 1570s–1610s

    Fontana Builds a Professional Career

    Working in Bologna and Rome, she paints portraits, religious subjects, and mythology. The Borghese Minerva Dressing is dated 1613.

  3. 1615–1620s

    Still-Life Markets and Ambitions in History Painting

    Peeters’s food still life of about 1615 displays material observation. Gentileschi enters Florence’s academy in 1616 and paints the Uffizi Judith around 1620.

  4. 1630s–1660s

    Public Self-Presentation, Guilds, and Teaching

    Leyster paints her Self-Portrait around 1630 and has joined the guild by 1633. Sirani completes The Baptism of Christ in 1658 and teaches women pupils.

  5. From the 1670s

    London Portraiture and International Flower Markets

    Beale operates her London portrait business; Ruysch’s professional flower painting extends from the seventeenth into the eighteenth century.

  6. 2019

    Conservation Changes Visibility

    Nelli’s restored Last Supper returns to public display in the Museum of Santa Maria Novella. Material research also supports understanding its collaborative production.

1 | Before Talent: The Conditions of Training

Odoardo Fialetti’s 1608 etching The Painter’s Studio makes learning visible as a set of activities. People draw at desks, grind materials, and work at easels; model heads and limbs lie nearby for study. It is not a documentary record of every studio, but it shows why painting cannot be explained by a solitary flash of inspiration. Space, equipment, examples, instruction, and prolonged practice all matter.

Access to these conditions was shaped by status and gender. Apprenticeship away from home, copying in public places, and study of nude models presented social and institutional obstacles for many women. Yet the rules of different cities, periods, and households cannot be collapsed into a universal prohibition on women learning to paint. Some trained with painter fathers, some studied with teachers arranged by their families, and others shared patterns and taught companions within convents.

Genres consequently intersected with opportunity, without forming a simple ranking of ability. Monumental history painting required both knowledge of many bodies and access to large commissions. Portraiture required clients willing to sit; still life called for specimens, vessels, and patient examination of surfaces. Restoring those investments to our account of art raises a question: which resources counted as professional education, and which forms of labor were dismissed as leisure accomplishments?

2 | Plautilla Nelli: The Convent as a Community of Making and Viewing

Plautilla Nelli was a Dominican nun in Florence and served as prioress. Her approximately seven-meter-long Last Supper was made for the refectory of Santa Caterina. Apostles and table approach bodily scale, joining the nuns’ daily meals with Christ’s last supper. The work is now in the Museum of Santa Maria Novella; its present display location should not be confused with the original commission.

Figures extend along the white tablecloth, gestures, turned heads, and oblique gazes carrying information across the broad canvas. Bread, dishes, and glasses give the sacred event everyday substance. Compared with Leonardo’s version, the emphasis falls less on driving the entire room toward a strong perspective center than on continuous relationships around the table. Conservation research has distinguished variations in handling that support multiple hands. The work is best understood as a collaborative enterprise directed by Nelli.

Nelli inherited and studied drawings by Fra Bartolommeo, turning existing images into adaptable teaching material. In her Lamentation with Saints, handkerchiefs, tears, and clustered heads organize collective grief around Christ’s body. Borrowing a pose did not preclude choice: altered proportions, groupings, and emotional emphasis could make an inherited model serve a new audience. Her convent functioned at once as patron, training ground, and collaborative network.

3 | Sofonisba Anguissola: The Household as a Place of Observation

Anguissola came from an aristocratic Cremonese family. Her father supported his daughters’ education and arranged their study with Bernardino Campi. This differed from direct apprenticeship in a painter father’s business. Family reputation, cultivated education, and outside contacts opened a route into painting and affected how she could present herself publicly.

The Chess Game of 1555 makes her sisters active thinkers. The girl at left looks beyond the painting with a hand still near the board; the girl at right raises her hand; the younger sister between them smiles. Their gazes sustain an unfinished exchange. Without mythological costume, they display judgment, surprise, and competition. Rich sleeves, jewels, and the carpet also identify the class-specific education and material conditions sustaining this intimate scene.

The older servant at right is distinguished by her clothing. Sharing the picture does not give her the sisters’ social position. Including a caregiver makes the household visible as a set of unequal roles. Familiar sitters also supported Anguissola’s study of expression in Child Bitten by a Crayfish: pain suddenly contorts one child’s face while another responds. Accessible models could be abundant resources for investigating momentary emotion.

4 | Self-Presentation and Royal Portraits: Reputation Was Not an Office

Anguissola repeatedly portrayed herself beside a keyboard instrument or easel. Music, painting, orderly dress, and restrained demeanor created the image of a cultivated woman, displaying ability while accommodating aristocratic expectations. Bernardino Campi Painting Sofonisba Anguissola introduces the teacher as if he were making her portrait, although she controls the entire composition. Pupilhood and authorship are nested within a single image.

In 1559 she went to Spain as a lady-in-waiting to Queen Elisabeth of Valois. She painted members of the royal family without receiving a formal appointment as court painter. The distinction matters. Access to power could bring reputation and opportunities, while payment, duties, and status operated differently from a city painter’s profession. Painting a monarch does not establish possession of every associated court office.

The Prado’s Philip II is dated 1573. Variations within the black costume emphasize face, hands, and the Order of the Golden Fleece. A hand resting on the chair preserves composure and distance, while the rosary in the left hand introduces piety. Technical examination reveals alterations to the clothing and right hand: this political image was adjusted during its making. Anguissola’s skill included recognizing which details would make a ruler legible in the required terms.

In 1624 Van Dyck recorded the elderly Anguissola in his sketchbook. That sheet and her youthful self-portraits offer different positions: another artist’s account of her and an image she organized herself. Read together, they invite inquiry into reputation across generations without making a male colleague’s approval the sole foundation of her artistic value.

5 | Lavinia Fontana: Portraiture as a Sustainable Profession

Trained in her father Prospero’s Bologna workshop, Fontana developed an independent career. She continued working through marriage and motherhood and became an important financial support for her household. Family could impose care obligations while also sustaining professional work through a division of labor. Her success belongs to relationships among studio, clients, and relatives, rather than an explanation based only on extraordinary personal energy.

The Portrait of Ginevra Aldrovandi Hercolani, about 1595, depicts an aristocratic widow. Black clothes do not suppress wealth: brocade, lace, and pearls articulate it. White collar and cuffs bring face and hands forward. A handkerchief evokes mourning, while the little dog can be both companion and an association with fidelity. Fontana’s precise handling turns possessions into a language of identity, making the client’s valued restraint and rank simultaneously visible.

Fontana also painted major religious works and mythological nudes. Minerva Dressing of 1613 turns the goddess toward the viewer; armor, shield, and owl preserve her identities of wisdom and martial power, while sumptuous fabric introduces another tactile and erotic register. This Borghese version must be distinguished from the earlier related composition. Women painters were not confined to fully clothed portraits. Access to subjects and clients also depended on urban circumstances, training, and collectors’ demands.

Lavinia Fontana, Portrait of Ginevra Aldrovandi Hercolani, about 1595. The Walters Art Museum, acquired by Henry Walters with the Massarenti Collection, 1902 (37.1915). Museum-contributed image via Wikimedia Commons, public domain. (Proportionally resized and converted to WebP.) Image source · Public domain (Walters institutional release; current museum images CC0)

6 | Artemisia Gentileschi: Constructing Force in History Painting

Gentileschi trained in the Roman workshop of her father Orazio and later worked in Florence, Rome, Naples, London, and elsewhere. Her admission to Florence’s Accademia del Disegno in 1616 was a significant recognition of professional standing, although membership did not remove every obstacle. Sustaining patronage in several cities required mobility, negotiation, and organization as well as painting.

The Uffizi’s Judith Slaying Holofernes, about 1620, presses action toward the viewer. Judith reaches forward while the servant bends over the resisting man; three bodies’ weight and counterforce meet upon the bed. Compared with Caravaggio’s treatment, the servant participates more directly. Blood, wrinkled sheets, and tension in sleeves give the event physical difficulty. Its force lies not only in intense expressions but in a composition that explains two people carrying out a dangerous action together.

The sexual violence she suffered and the trial of 1612 are documented, but no Judith painting should thereby be reduced to private revenge. Scripture, virtue, collectors’ demands, and competitive responses to earlier paintings also shaped the subject. This Florentine version is a different canvas from the earlier one in Naples. Nor should her life stop at trauma. Documents now establish that she was alive in 1654; interpretation of her works and career must remain responsive to evidence.

7 | Becoming Painting: What Can a Self-Portrait Claim?

In Self-Portrait as the Allegory of Painting, about 1638–39, Gentileschi’s body follows a strong diagonal. The raised hand, inclined torso, and concentrated gaze point beyond the frame. She does not pause to present a frontal face; she presents work in progress. Light gives weight to the sleeve, while the turning neck and shoulder connect thought with movement.

Allegory uses figures and attributes to embody abstract ideas. Painting was conventionally personified as a woman holding a brush and palette. Gentileschi could therefore bring her own portrait into alignment with that female personification: the practitioner becomes the visible body of Painting itself. This does not imply that only women could paint allegory. It identifies a particular pictorial possibility made available by her gender.

Compare Anguissola’s representation at a keyboard. One associates artistic ability with cultivation; the other foregrounds creative action. Sirani’s Self-Portrait as an Allegory of Painting of 1658 approaches the related claim through different posture and rich dress. Self-portraits are therefore constructed public statements rather than transparent records of character. Their makers decide which abilities, identities, and symbols will appear together.

8 | Elisabetta Sirani: Public Commissions and Teaching

Sirani likewise began in a family workshop in Bologna. As her father’s health declined, her painting supported the household; she also taught her sisters and other young women. Her importance extends beyond surviving works to the skills she passed on. When a woman could direct a studio, accept commissions, and educate pupils, an individual career could create further routes into training.

The Baptism of Christ for San Girolamo was contracted in 1657 and is dated 1658. Its broad composition links crowds by the Jordan, Christ’s baptism, and the heavens above, requiring control of different scales, group movement, and viewing from a distance. Public church commissions had conditions different from small paintings for private collections. A picture had to work in architecture, and patrons needed confidence that a complex project would be delivered on time.

Timoclea Killing the Captain of Alexander the Great (1659) selects the instant of a reversal of power. The officer falls headfirst into the well while the woman commands the body and space above. Upright and inverted figures immediately clarify the action. A comparison with Gentileschi’s Judith is illuminating without presuming identical psychological motives.

Matteo Borboni designed a temporary commemorative structure for Sirani’s funeral observances in 1665. His drawing shows columns surrounding a woman seated at an easel: a life-size wax figure of the artist. Sirani had already been buried; no coffin stood at the center. Ink and wash preserve an ephemeral ceremonial installation and reveal a city publicly commemorating a professional artist through the act of painting.

Matteo Borboni, Catafalque of the Bolognese Artist Elisabetta Sirani, 1665. Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum, Museum purchase through gift of various donors and from Eleanor G. Hewitt Fund (1938-88-2503). Image via Wikimedia Commons, public domain; Smithsonian object record CC 0. (Proportionally resized and converted to WebP.) Image source · Public domain (PD-Art); Smithsonian object record CC0

9 | Clara Peeters: Materials and Authorship on a Small Scale

Peeters’s biography is much less secure than her paintings. Signed works, Antwerp makers’ marks on some panels, and connections with local still life offer research leads. They do not fill the gaps concerning marriage, training, or exact birth and death dates. Keeping those uncertainties visible respects the historical person more than converting conjecture into a complete life.

In Still Life with Cheeses, Almonds and Pretzels, about 1615, stacked cheeses form a mass to the left, while a knife and shallow dish lead toward the table edge. Rough cut surfaces, translucent glass, a metal lid, and luminous blue-and-white porcelain require different tactile effects from the same oil paint. Food and refined vessels connect everyday consumption to trade and wealth. The table is a meeting place of circulating objects, not a quiet corner outside the world.

Look for the name on the knife handle and the tiny reflected face in the jug’s metal lid: the painter appears among the objects. This miniature self-image is both an optical challenge and a clue to authorship. Expertise in food and flowers need not represent an unambitious fallback. Still life had a professional market and could concentrate observation, composition, and material imitation with extraordinary intensity. The small picture draws viewers close, where they discover its maker.

The Ashmolean’s Still Life of Fruit and Flowers is painted on copper and dated by the museum to about 1612–13. A smooth, relatively nonabsorbent support suits detailed handling, sharpening petals, grapes, and the edges of vessels. Comparison requires asking not only what is depicted but what it is painted on. Panel, copper, and canvas condition the construction of detail and the viewer’s experience of finish.

10 | Judith Leyster: Professional Rights behind an Easy Pose

Leyster was a member of Haarlem’s Guild of Saint Luke by 1633 and is documented with three pupils in 1635. When one moved to Frans Hals’s studio, she pursued fees owed through the guild. These ordinary business details offer more concrete evidence than a story about admiration from a master. She possessed teaching labor, students, and financial rights that institutions could help defend. Stylistic proximity to Hals does not by itself establish a formal apprenticeship.

Her Self-Portrait of about 1630 shows her seated sideways, an arm resting on the chair back, turning as if to begin a conversation. White collar and gleaming sleeves do more than record dress: they demonstrate her handling of transparent, reflective, and soft surfaces. The violinist on her easel advertises her lively figure paintings. The ease is carefully made, introducing her appearance, skill, and marketable specialty together.

A Boy and a Girl with a Cat and an Eel combines smiles, raised hands, and a struggling animal in an unsettling game. Children’s energy is apparent, but so are questions about the consequences of tormenting animals. Such genre painting depends on posture and a deliberately ambiguous narrative moment. Later, works by Leyster were attributed to Hals and other male painters. Professional recognition during an artist’s lifetime did not ensure that her name survived correctly in collections, markets, and scholarship.

11 | Rachel Ruysch: Natural Knowledge Becomes Composition

Ruysch studied with still-life painter Willem van Aelst from around fifteen. Her father’s anatomical and botanical pursuits and collections offered another observational resource. Scientific surroundings and artistic training should be distinguished while their connections are examined. Recognizing a plant’s structure is one kind of knowledge; arranging petals within pictorial depth requires another set of decisions. Neither is explained by an innate “feminine attention to detail.”

In the V&A’s A Still Life with a Spray of Flowers, a dark ground supports the bouquet. White petals advance, thin stems and leaves reach diagonally, and insects occupy the near space. Uneven illumination establishes an order of discovery: certain flowers register immediately, others emerge slowly from shade. Seemingly casual branches conduct the gaze between the dense center and more open edges. The flowers must reward individual scrutiny while sustaining the rhythm of the whole.

Her career extended into the eighteenth century and attracted international clients and a court appointment. Flower painting could be a costly professional product circulating across borders. Treating every bouquet merely as an emblem of transience is inadequate: exact description also displays rare plants, material knowledge, and compositional intelligence. Fading and time may inform one reading, but should not obscure the work performed by color, curves, and light.

12 | Mary Beale: Put the Accounts beside the Portrait

Beale established her London studio in 1670 and became the family’s principal earner. Her husband Charles managed the business and recorded income and material expenses; their son also helped with portrait backgrounds. These records let us understand “a Beale portrait” as divided production. The principal painter determined its key image and quality, while preparing materials, scheduling, collecting payments, and partial collaboration also enabled its completion.

Charles’s surviving notebooks discuss supports, oils, brush costs, and even procedures for painting on unusual fabrics. Technique emerges as knowledge that could be tested, compared, and costed, rather than an ineffable secret. His support should not be romanticized as the sole explanation of success. The notebooks exist because Mary’s work sustained a business worth managing carefully.

The Portrait of Gertrude Savile, Marchioness of Halifax, about 1679, responds to Restoration taste through soft flesh, draped fabric, and a composed pose, in a vocabulary comparable with Peter Lely’s. Blue and brown-gold fabrics overlap below the shoulder; a lowered hand gives the luxurious surfaces stability without rigidity. Broad highlights on the folds connect upper body and hands. Dress conveys rank while making technique recognizable value for the customer. From Nelli’s collaborative canvas to Beale’s accounts, these nine careers do not form an inevitable march of progress. Preserving works, working relationships, and evidence of authorship together allows us to see how art actually came into being.

A short glossary

Key terms

Workshop
A place for production, training, and receiving clients. Principal artists, pupils, and relatives could share tasks; a signed work need not have been painted everywhere by one hand.
Guild
A city organization regulating professional qualifications, training, and some business relationships. Rules and conditions of admission for women differed from place to place.
Academy
An institution providing artistic discussion, instruction, or professional recognition. Its role differed from that of guilds and family studios, and membership did not guarantee equal learning opportunities.
History Painting
Narrative painting of biblical, mythological, ancient historical, or allegorical subjects, generally requiring the organization of figures, actions, and meaning. It is not restricted to modern historical events.
Allegory
The embodiment of abstract concepts through figures, clothing, poses, and objects. A female personification can represent Painting, but interpretation depends on attributes and pictorial context.
Still Life
Painting centered on arrangements of objects, flowers, fruit, food, and similar things. It can address natural knowledge, trade, time, and visual pleasure; no single symbol explains every work.
Attribution
An assessment of authorship based on signatures, documents, technical study, style, and other evidence. “Attributed to,” “workshop of,” “circle of,” and securely autograph works make different levels of claim.

Your turn to reflect

Do we apply the same standards of authorship when a woman’s studio depended on relatives or assistants as we do when considering other painters’ workshops?

Consider another perspective

Compare production on equal terms. Collaboration does not automatically cancel an artist’s invention, teaching, quality control, or responsibility to clients. The evidential task is to identify who performed which work and how securely that division can be established.

Take this question into your next encounter with art

Women artists’ histories reside both in their paintings and in the practical conditions of learning, shared labor, access to clients, and the survival of an author’s name.

Sources and further reading

This guide draws on the course materials of Dr Antonia Gatward Cevizli | Women Artists: 16th and 17th Centuries (Spring 2026) | 68-page presentation; 3-page resource sheet (credited to Dr Antonia Cevizli), alongside public research from museums, historic sites and research institutions. Art Value Lab has developed the close readings, comparisons and looking questions for this online edition. Image sources and licences appear in the captions.

Read further

  • Dr Antonia Gatward Cevizli, Women Artists: 16th and 17th CenturiesV&A Academy, Spring 2026; 68-page presentation and 3-page resource sheet

    English teaching sources for the chapter’s examples and themes, developed in original editorial prose and checked against museums, heritage bodies, and scholarship.

  • Linda Nochlin, Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?Thames & Hudson, 50th-anniversary edition, 2021

    Recommended in the resource sheet. Reframes the emergence of “great artists” through education and institutions; a useful companion to the workshop questions here.

  • Eve Straussman-Pflanzer et al., By Her Hand: Artemisia Gentileschi and Women Artists in Italy, 1500–1800Yale University Press,2021

    Recommended in the resource sheet. Brings varied professional circumstances and individual works by women artists into a shared field of study.

  • Jonathan K. Nelson, ed., Plautilla Nelli: The Painter-Prioress of Renaissance FlorenceSyracuse University in Florence,2008

    Recommended in the resource sheet. Studies paintings, drawings, conservation, and the convent setting, extending questions of copying and collaboration.

  • Cecilia Gamberini, Sofonisba AnguissolaLund Humphries,2024

    Recommended in the resource sheet. Traces education, court status, and reputation across regions.

  • Aoife Brady, Lavinia Fontana: Trailblazer, Rule BreakerNational Gallery of Ireland,2023

    Exhibition catalogue recommended in the resource sheet. Uses portraits and large commissions to investigate professional practice and material culture.

  • Letizia Treves et al., ArtemisiaYale University Press,2020

    Exhibition catalogue recommended in the resource sheet. Restores Gentileschi to the study of versions, patronage, and a career across cities.

  • Adelina Modesti, Elisabetta SiraniLund Humphries,2023

    Recommended in the resource sheet. Further study of Bolognese workshops, public commissions, and women’s teaching networks.

  • Alejandro Vergara, The Art of Clara PeetersMuseo Nacional del Prado,2016

    Recommended in the resource sheet. Examines still-life technique and biographical evidence while keeping unresolved questions open.

  • Penelope Hunting, My Dearest Heart: The Artist Mary BealeUnicorn,2019

    Recommended in the resource sheet. Approaches Beale’s professional work and family collaboration through portraits and documents.